POVonline
news from me

March 20, 2003 · 10:00 AM PST · link

STILL BUSY but I wanted to post a link to this article over at a terrific website called Spinsanity.  It lists myths, misconceptions and some outright lies relating to the war on Iraq, and may come in handy for folks who want to know the truth of what's going on.  Sadly, that doesn't seem to be everyone.

Okay.  Back to being busy...

March 19, 2003 · 10:00 PM PST · link

ONCE AGAIN, I have posted a picture of a can of Campbell's Cream of Mushroom Soup, the traditional* signal that the proprietor of a website is too busy to update it.  In this case, it also means that said proprietor may be too busy to respond to all but the most vital e-mails for a few days.  But things change, life goes on (unless you live in Baghdad) and schedules free up.  When mine does, I'll be back to regular Internet participation.  And thanks to all of you who sent money just because I posted a picture of Julie Newmar.

*Well, at least it's a tradition I'm trying to start.  All traditions have to begin somewhere.

March 19, 2003 · 1:30 AM PST · link

CLICK HERE TO SEE THE WHOLE PANEL

COMIC BOOK ART is usually drawn in pencil by one guy and then, after the page is lettered, the work is "inked" by another.  The inker interprets and embellishes...and since it's his linework that gets reproduced in the finished publication, he can go a long way towards improving or ruining or just preserving what the pencil artist did.  Throughout his career, the late, great Jack Kirby had his pencilled pages inked by a wide range of great talents and a few of the lesser variety.  The efforts of one inker, Vince Colletta, remain especially controversial, long after the work was done and both men have passed on.

To be fair, Colletta has his fans and his work was loved by many readers of the day.  But some of the artists whose work he inked felt he had minimal talent and all felt he expended minimal effort.  (Again, to be fair, he was often paid minimal money — but so were a lot of guys who put in more time.)

One of the big complaints about Colletta was that he would simply leave things out.  The panel above, which was scanned from a piece of Kirby/Colletta original art for The Fantastic Four, gives us an example.  If you click on it and enlarge the image, you'll see that Jack drew in a figure of Mr. Fantastic that Vince and/or his staff of lowly-paid assistants just ignored.  I've occasionally seen inkers do this for creative reasons because they felt it improved the composition, but Colletta tended to decide this any time a page took him more than about 90 minutes.

Anyway, folks sometimes ask me why so many artists disliked Colletta's inking and there's one of the reasons.  Thanks to Tom Field for the scan, and to Glen Gold who first noticed this omission.

I MADE THE MISTAKE of driving through Hollywood and Highland this afternoon and found myself smack-dab in the middle of heightened security measures for the upcoming Academy Awards.  I warn all my friends in L.A. to steer clear of the area until the Oscars have come and gone.  (By the way: A friend of mine who's going to the ceremony said, "Never mind the threat of terrorism.  I'm just hoping they can protect me from Joan Rivers.")

EVERY YEAR, the Comic-Con International in San Diego fills every hotel room, motel room, suite, lodge, hostel and pup-tent for miles around.  This year will surely be no exception so if you're going, book now.  You can do so online at the convention website, www.comic-con.org — but hurry.  Rooms are disappearing even as you read this.

A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO, sci-fi legend Forrest J Ackerman went to court against publisher Ray Ferry.  The two had worked together to revive Famous Monsters of Filmland, the magazine Ackerman edited for Warren Publishing in and around the sixties.  The new venture ended in bitterness.  Ackerman quit or was fired, depending on which version you believe, and Ferry claimed ownership of the publication and various trademarks (like Ackerman's nickname, "Dr. Acula") and assets.  As explained here, Ackerman won the suit in 2000 and if we are to believe the press release he recently issued, he has now won the appeal.

Forry (aka Dr. Acula, aka Mr. Sci-Fi) has had a few rocky years lately.  Less than a year ago, all the newsfolks who cover science-fiction were reporting that he was hospitalized and expected to check out before he checked out.  Soon after, he proved all those reports wrong and not only got out but presided over the sale of most of his infamous collection of horror and science-fiction memorabilia.  He is now living in a small bungalow not far from the site of the old Ackermansion, welcoming visitors, working on memoirs and still going out to attend conventions and do cameos in movies.  The Mummy hasn't come back from the dead half as many times...

March 18, 2003 · 12:45 PM PST · link

ONE OTHER oddment from the Michael Larson sweep on Press Your Luck:  As the man was racking up cash, the program's scorekeepers got rather flustered.  After his 17th spin, Larson was at $40,601.  On his 18th, he hit a thousand-dollar space and they upped his total to $42,601.  The error wasn't caught at the time, and apparently Larson collected his grand total of $110,237 even though he actually won $109,237.  This does not mean the producers never noticed it.  They probably caught the mistake later but decided they didn't want to risk hearing more from Larson or his lawyers.

TONY BLAIR offers what is essentially the rebuttal to Robin Cook's speech.  You can read it here.

I PROBABLY don't need to say this but I vacillate between whether I should post political/war stuff on this page or leave that to the experts and confine myself to trivia.  I keep changing my mind and probably always will — so don't expect consistency in that regard.  I post what's on my mind...and my mind, like yours, cycles through periods of not wanting to focus on what's going on in the world and other periods where it must.  That's how it's got to be.

March 18, 2003 · 9:45 AM PST · link

G. W. BUSH maintains that no second U.N. resolution is necessary.  Other nations believe it is.  How did grown men who represent whole nations wind up in such disagreement?  Joshua Micah Marshall has an explanation.

March 17, 2003 · 11:30 PM PST · link

AND FOR those of you who don't have RealPlayer (which can be a very intrusive program if you don't watch out), here's a link to a text version of the Robin Cook speech.  But hearing it is even better.

March 17, 2003 · 10:30 PM PST · link

HAVE YOU got eleven minutes?  More important, have you got RealPlayer installed?  I just watched and would like to share with you the 11-minute resignation speech delivered by Robin Cook, the British government's highly respected leader in parliament.  He quit yesterday to protest Prime Minister Tony Blair's position stance on Iraq.

I have, as visitors to this website well know, next-to-no respect for the folks in Washington on either side of the aisle.  In fact, I tend to take the position that those who seem to have more integrity are merely the ones who haven't gotten around yet to disappointing me.  Maybe I'm so desperate for sincerity that I've fallen for a reasonable facsimile, but Mr. Cook impressed me.  I don't know that I believe everything he says in this speech (there's your link to the video clip) but I believe our political system would work so much better if its participants could deal in this sort of rhetoric.

Give it a look.  It starts slow, and some of you may disagree with his position.  But it's always worth seeing an argument stated with such eloquence and sincerity.

SPEAKING OF Brits and Iraq, a funny essay called "Other Axis of Evil Wannabees" is making the e-mail rounds, generally identified as the work of John Cleese.  Apparently, it is not by Mr. Cleese but comes from the SatireWire website.  Here's a link to their posting of the piece.

March 17, 2003 · 8:00 PM PST · link

IS THERE A SUPERMAN CURSE?  A number of "news" stories currently moving about the wires are asking if actors are now shunning the role because of what it's done to those who've accepted it.  And I guess it's a good story — but even if one believes in curses, this one doesn't measure up too well.  Yes, George Reeves died a shocking, unexpected death...but Mr. Reeves was (a) drinking heavily to ease the pains from an auto accident and (b) fooling around with a mobster's lady.  Either or both can make you pretty dead pretty fast, as has been proven by a number of folks who never flew around in a cape.  Yes, Christopher Reeve suffered a paralyzing accident but — and I don't mean to make light of it — these things do happen among other folks who jump horses.

The first film Superman, Kirk Alyn, also died — though 49 years after he last put on the Superman suit.  Kind of a slow-acting curse.  Bud Collyer, who voiced the character on radio and cartoons also died a few decades after he stopped portraying the Man of Steel.  (Actually, he had returned to the role after a 20 year absence and voiced a few more cartoons.  I guess one could stretch and say he got cocky, defied the curse...and it finally got him.  But that's a bit of a reach.)

Some have suggested that it isn't that The Superman Curse takes your life; it's that it does something equally-awful to those in show business: It destroys your career.  There might be something to this but, if so, it probably has more to do with the fact that portraying a cartoon character — wearing a garish costume on screen that overshadows its wearer — has never been a major boost for anyone's career.  It may not hurt but it sure doesn't help.  Years after The Wizard of Oz, Bert Lahr reportedly said, "Everyone told me it was one of the greatest performances in the history of film, but it was kind of like, 'We'll call you the next time we need a guy in a lion suit!'"

Thus, Kirk Alyn's post-Superman career was pretty much the same as dozens of other actors his age who'd starred in cheap serials and B-Movies.  Kirk was a charming gent who was a fixture at comic conventions until his death in 1999.  But I'm afraid I don't recall anyone suggesting that a great actor had been stifled.  Bud Collyer was enormously successful as a game show host.  George Reeves, despite urban legends to the contrary, had offers of work as both a writer and a director at the time of his death.  Christopher Reeve certainly had a lot more success as a film actor after Superman than before.  And as for the more recent wearers of the costume, it's too early to tell.

What I'm getting at (and what I was trying to say when quoted in this article over at E!Online) is that all these careers pretty much went as might have been expected without playing the guy from Krypton.  If any, the role helped — though not much.  And if a lot of actors are turning it down now, as has been reported, it's probably not because they think it'll kill them or their careers.  It's that the stardom of leading men these days gets judged from movie to movie, and playing that part can seem like a lose-lose situation.  If the film's a flop, everyone will say the star has no following and that he isn't hot anymore.  But if it's a hit, the star won't get much credit.  Everyone will say it's because people love Superman.

March 17, 2003 · 6:00 PM PST · link

ALL RIGHT, everyone say it with me in unison: "Boy, I hope George W. Bush knows what he's doing."

DISNEY COMICS are coming back.  Here's a link, thanks to Ken Plume, to a good interview with Steve Geppi about the marketplace and how mice and ducks may fit into it.

March 16, 2003 · 1:00 AM PST · link

WELL, I HOPE those of you who caught Big Bucks: The Press Your Luck Scandal based on my endless hyping thought it was worth the build-up.  (If you didn't see it, Game Show Network is running it several more times.)  The folks who put the documentary together did a good job, I thought, of telling the story and I really appreciated the fact that, though they interrupted the action for annotations, they pretty much allowed the videotape to speak for itself.

This morning, though I had nothing whatsoever to do with the program, I found myself on two different radio shows discussing it.  One host asked me why, in the era of "All Reality Shows, All The Time," I found this ancient bit of reality interesting.  I think the answer is that, first of all, it's your basic David/Goliath story.  Who could not like a story where a little guy came in and outsmarted a big-time TV network?  Secondly, today's Reality Shows are really Controlled-Reality Shows.  The producers may not know who's going to remain on the island after everyone else gets voted off...but they know someone will be.  They do not wind up standing around with their mouths open, muttering, "We never imagined that would happen."  Michael Larson, who went on Press Your Luck and won $110,000 (plus change) had just that impact on everyone.

Even supposedly-spontaneous TV shows aren't that spontaneous.  If Mssrs. Leno, Letterman, O'Brien, Kilborn, Kimmel and Maher are on for another fifty years, we'll never see any of their shows spin as wildly out of control as Press Your Luck did for about an hour there.  You will never see the stars, producers, directors and crew as clueless as to what's occurring on their own programs as the PYL staff was on account of Michael Larson.  Some execs at CBS almost didn't air the shows, ostensibly because they didn't want to revive memories of the quiz show scandals of the fifties.  Watching the Game Show Network airing last night, it dawned on me: They weren't really worried about that.  They were just uncomfortable that, for one brief moment there, they lost control.

Changing subjects, but only slightly: Watching Press Your Luck might give you a hankering to test yourself against its cleverly-configured game board.  There was a computer "home game" marketed briefly back in the eighties but it wasn't too good.  A devout fan of the show — a gent I do not know at all — cobbled up an authorized homemade version for the PC that works rather well, at least on my computer.  I don't guarantee it will work on yours, so proceed — as they say — with caution and at your own risk.  It does not contain the question rounds, but you don't care about them anyway.  Here's the link to the site where you can download it.  You'll need an unzipping utility and no, I don't know of a Press Your Luck for the Mac.  Oh — and don't complain to me if it doesn't work or ask for my help.  I have nothing to do with it.

I ADDED a new page to our TV Tickets section — but just to be annoying, I added it in the middle and moved a few other tickets around.  Over the next few weeks, I'll be adding at least ten more pages of vintage tickets, many of them sent in by some very nice readers of this website.

March 16, 2003 · 10:30 AM PST · link

WE KEEP HEARING that judgments in medical malpractice suits need to be limited because insurance premiums are driving doctors out of business or out of certain areas.  The case for this seems anecdotal and weak to me, and I'm inclined to suspect that Ralph Nader is right; that we could solve the problem better by limiting how much profit the insurance companies can make.  (Actually, we will probably solve it some day with some form of national health care, but that will be a long time in coming.)  In any case, the issue is currently being tackled by that greatest of all medicos, Rex Morgan, M.D.  Here's a link to a site where you can read the comic strip.  And here's a link to a letter that appeared the other day in the Washington Post telling why the above price quote is bogus.

Recommended Reading

The U.S. Needs To Open Itself To The World
by Brian Eno, Time

No Liberal Exchange Policy
by George F. Will, Washington Post

An Open Letter to Nader Voters
by Charles Taylor, Salon

The Glorious Bush Program: Sign Me Up!
by Molly Ivins, Creators Syndicate

Truth Be Told
by Peter Beinart, New Republic

Anti-French Frustrations
by William F. Buckley Jr., National Review

The articles linked to in this section are ones that the proprietor of this website feels make interesting points.  He does not necessarily agree with any or all of them — and you won't, either.

ONE OF my great friends and colleagues was a wonderful artist named Pat Boyette, who was eulogized in this column here.  Another friend and admirer of his (Pat had a lot of friends and admirers) was Don Mangus.  Don has written his thoughts on the man for a fine website called Comicartville.  Here's a direct link to Don's piece on Pat, but you really ought to browse the entire site.

MANY OF YOU have purchased and devoured the first book.  Some of you even read it.  Soon, you'll be able to purchase and devour the second volume of my pieces about the comic book field. Maybe you'll even read...

Click here to read the previous NEWS FROM ME

Front Page

NEWS from me

NEWS Archives

NOTES from me

Hollywood

Broadway

Las Vegas

Animation

Comics

TV & Movies

Comedy

Miscellaneous

I.A.Q.

Links

ABOUT me

BUY me

Info/E-MAIL me

SEARCH

© 2007 Mark Evanier

Hosted by Dreamhost

If you enjoy this site, show your appreciation by using our links to order from Amazon or Movies Unlimited, or to donate via PayPal. Thanks.